November 13, 2021，From "Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Society Edition)" and "Tsinghua Law", "Law", "Modern Law" and "Empirical Legal Research"、bet365 app、Shandong University Data Science Research Institute、"Empirical Legal Research and the Construction of the Rule of Law in China" and the 5th "Toward Data Law" Seminar jointly organized by Shandong System and Computational Law Research Center (in no particular order)，Held online。from Peking University、Tsinghua University、Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Chinese Academy of Sciences、Jilin University、Sichuan University、Southeast University、East China University of Political Science and Law、Hunan University、Southwestern University of Finance and Economics、Shandong University、South China University of Technology、University of International Business and Economics、bet365 Play online gamesYunnan University、Shandong Normal University、Shanghai University of Political Science and Law、Shanghai Railway Transport Court、Jining Intermediate School and University of Hong Kong、The Chinese University of Hong Kong、More than 40 experts and scholars from Singapore Management University and other academic units and practical departments attended the meeting。
The opening ceremony of the conference was hosted by Professor Wei Jian, Chief Editor of "Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Society Edition)"，Professor Zhou Changjun, Dean of bet365 app, delivers a speech。Professor Zhao Wanyi, Chief Editor of "Modern Law" of Southwest University of Political Science and Law、Professor Yu Gaizhi, deputy editor-in-chief of "Law" of East China University of Political Science and Law, hosted the morning and afternoon keynote reports respectively、Paper exchange and academic review session。
Professor Bai Jianjun, Peking University Law School、Professor Zuo Weimin of Sichuan University Law School gave keynote reports entitled "On Criminal Law Doctrine and Empirical Research" and "Empirical Research on the Reform of Post Judge Selection Mechanism: Taking Province A as a Sample"。Professor Bai Jianjun thinks，Qualitative research and quantitative analysis、The difference between normative science and factual science,Only the superficial difference between criminal law doctrine and criminal law empirical research,It conceals the inherent harmonious value of the two。Unification of criminal law doctrine and empirical research in practical rationality,Encounter in a large sample of criminal law phenomena,Intersection with the validity of law。Empirical research on criminal law without dogmatics,Or criminal law dogmatics without empirical research,It is not conducive to the overall development of Chinese criminal law research。Professor Zuo Weimin was appointed as a judge with 5357 judges in Province A、543 eliminated judges as analysis objects，With the help of statistical analysis software，Shows the practice of selecting post judges in Province A in the form of a large Bet365 app downloadsample、Basic features。On this basis，On the pros and cons of relevant reforms、In-depth analysis of issues such as how to further promote the improvement of relevant systems in the future。The participating experts and scholars had a lively discussion and exchange of views between the two professors。
Based on the previous national call for papers，The organizing committee organized experts to carefully select 10 papers from more than 80 submitted papers to participate in the conference and exchange，And 2 experts in related fields are arranged as reviewers for each participating paper。10 paper authors gave exchange reports at the meeting，The content involves the reform of the case guidance system、Perfect emergency response system、Leniency in sentencing for guilty pleas、Improving the professional knowledge and cognitive abilities of judges、The operating mechanism of the personal safety protection order is smooth、Non-statutory reasons and divorce judgment、Judge resigned、Hot and difficult issues in the rule of law such as the preservation and abolition of the death penalty。The authors start from the question、Literature Review、Theoretical model and hypothesis、Data presentation and analysis、Conclusions and prospects, etc.，Reported and exchanged their own research experience。Every review expert has made full preparations，Carefully reviewed the division of labor paper，Written detailed written opinions，And produced a review PPT。They select innovative topics、Structural rigor、Argument rigor、Scientific method、Data reliability、Representative case、Persuasiveness of conclusion, etc.，Provided a detailed and thoughtful review of the paper，Fully affirming the merits of each paper，Pointed out problems and shortcomings in a realistic and realistic manner，And put forward specific suggestions for modification and improvement。Many authors also discussed related issues involved in the paper，Conducted in-depth consultation Bet365 sportsbook reviewwith the review experts in the conference WeChat group。The participating authors generally reported that they benefited a lot。
The conference also invited Professor Chen Qiang from the School of Economics of Shandong University to conduct a special review on the empirical research methods of the participating papers。Professor Chen Qiang raised specific issues regarding the empirical methods of each paper、Operation suggestions，Combined with the common problems existing in the empirical methods of the paper，Notes on the use of empirical methods in legal research、Typical case selection、Regression analysis, etc.，Explained his opinion。
The closing ceremony of the conference was hosted by Professor Dong Yanbin, deputy editor-in-chief of "Modern Law" of Southwest University of Political Science and Law。Professor He Haibo, deputy editor-in-chief of "Tsinghua Law"、Professor Wei Jian, editor-in-chief of "Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Society Edition)", made a summary of the meeting。Professor He Haibo thinks，The keynote reports of two experts are profound，Thought-provoking；Evaluation experts are serious and responsible，High level of evaluation；The conference is rich in content，Hot discussion，It is a rare academic event。He also discussed how empirical research in law can gain more recognition、Enhance problem awareness、Scientific data processing、Improving research methods and other issues，Explained his views。Editor Wei Jian pointed out，The theme report and the comments of the review experts at this conference are very exciting，Fully embodies the characteristics of multi-disciplinary integration。Two chief editors report on topic experts、Evaluation Expert、The author of the paper expresses his gratitude，And proposes that all units that jointly organize this meeting continue to strengthen cooperation in the next step，Further promote the development and expansion of the academic community of empirical legal research and data legal research。
From the public account of "Journal of Shandong University, Philosophy and Society Edition"
