November 27, 2022，The 7th National Judicial Forum was grandly held in the beautiful coastal city of Jimo Ancient City, Qingdao。As early as more than two thousand years ago，Jimo has become a famous city in Qi State，Developed economy，Cultural prosperity。This forum is located here，It can be said that it has a thousand-year cultural heritage，In response to the trend of the times，It has the significance of carrying forward the past and opening up the future。

This forum is hosted by bet365 app、Sponsored by Judicial Research Center of Shandong University (in preparation)，By Shandong Provincial Judicial Research Base、Judicial Science Research Institute of East China University of Political Science and Law、Co-organized by Shandong Wending Law Firm。The forum takes the form of a combination of offline and online meetings。The opening ceremony of the conference was hosted by Professor Zhou Changjun, Dean of Bet365 University，Assistant to the President of Shandong University、Xing Zhanjun, deputy secretary of the Party Working Committee of Qingdao Campus, delivers a welcome speech，The closing ceremony was delivered by Yu Xiangming, Secretary of the Party Committee of bet365 app。The keynote report stage is taught by the Data Law Research Institute of China University of Political Science and Law、Doctoral Supervisor、Presided over by Fan Mingzhi, former deputy director of the China Institute of Applied Law, Supreme People’s Court，The first stage of the keynote speech was hosted by Professor Zheng Zhihang, Vice President of Bet365 App，The second stage is hosted by Professor Cai Yingwen, Dean of Qingdao University Law School。The reviewers at each stage are: the first stage of the keynote speech is chair professor of Shandong University、Xie Pengcheng, former director of the Institute of Procuratorial Theory of the Supreme People's Procuratorate，Professor of Shanghai University Law School、Comments from doctoral supervisor Li Qingwei。The second stage of the keynote speech was given by the Dean of the Institute of Comparative Law, China University of Political Science and Law、Professor、Doctoral Supervisor、Xie Zhiyong, editor-in-chief of the magazine "Comparative Law Research"，bet365 appvice president、Professor、Comments from doctoral supervisor Feng Junwei。

The forum is guided by studying and implementing the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Party，Establish the theme of "Chinese-style legal modernization and judicial reform"，And set "(1) Basic elements of Chinese-style rule of law modernization；(2) How judicial reform promotes the modernization of the Chinese-style rule of law；(3) The relationship between the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law and the inheritance of China’s excellent traditional legal culture；(4) Four sub-topics on how to integrate socialist core values ​​into judicial practice。This forum has selected dozens of outstanding theme papers before the meeting，And made into a collection of papers。At the forum，Experts and scholars will conduct more in-depth research and discussions around the forum topic。

The leaders participating in the forum mainly include: Deputy Chairman of the Supervisory and Judicial Committee of the National People’s Congress、Chairman of the Teaching Steering Committee for Law Majors in Higher Education Institutions of the Ministry of Education、Xu Xianming, former deputy prosecutor general of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate，Deputy Chairman of the Constitution and Law Committee of the National People’s Congress、Jiang Bixin, former Vice President of the Supreme People’s Court，Former President of Shanghai Higher People’s Court、Secretary of the Party Leadership Group of Shanghai Law Society、President Cui Yadong，Former President of Shandong Provincial Higher People’s Court、Zhou Yuhua, member of the Advisory Committee of the Supreme People's Court，Former President of East China University of Political Science and Law、Vice President of the Chinese Judicial Research Association、He Qinhua, Honorary Dean of the Institute of Judicial Science, East China University of Political Science and Law，Professor Zheng Yunrui, Dean of the Institute of Judicial Science of East China University of Political Science and Law, and more than 20 department-level leaders from various political and legal systems。

Supreme People's Court、Supreme People’s Procuratorate、Ministry of Justice、Shanghai High Court、Chongqing High Court、Guangxi High Court、Hebei Provincial High Court、Gansu Provincial High Court、Anhui Provincial People’s Procuratorate、Hainan Provincial People’s Procuratorate、Langfang People’s Procuratorate、Jinan People’s Procuratorate、Shanghai Minhang District People’s Court、Chengdu Intermediate People’s Court、Chenzhou Intermediate People’s Court、Binzhou Intermediate People’s Court、Pingdingshan Intermediate People’s Court、Shanghai Jinshan District People’s Procuratorate、Shanghai Hongkou District People’s Procuratorate、Democratic League Central Committee、Central Party History and Documentation Research Institute、Tsinghua University、Renmin University of China、China University of Political Science and Law、East China University of Political Science and Law、Shanghai Jiaotong University、Tongji University、Shanghai University、Shanghai University of Political Science and Law、Northwestern University of Political Science and Law、Liaoning Police College、Shandong University of Political Science and Law、Qingdao University、Ningbo University、Wenzhou University、Shandong Agricultural University、Yantai University、Capital Normal University、Shanxi Normal University、Zhongnan University of Economics and Law、Suzhou University、Zhejiang Gongshang University、Ocean University of China、Zhengzhou University、Jinan University、Guizhou University for Nationalities、Dalian Maritime University、Zhejiang University、Tianjin University、People's Public Security University of China、Lanzhou University、Southeast University、Hebei Engineering University、Hainan Vocational College of Political Science and Law、Kala University, Thailand、University of Delaware, USA，More than a hundred people including teachers and students from Shandong University attended the meeting。

Under the guidance of the goal of studying and implementing the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Party，The forum discussed in depth the connotation of Chinese-style rule of law modernization in the new era、Value and significance，On how to implement the comprehensive supporting reform of the judicial system proposed by the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China、Comprehensively and accurately implement the judicial accountability system、Accelerating the construction of a fair, efficient and authoritative socialist judicial system and other major issues，Participating scholars offer suggestions，Colliding with many forward-looking people、Strategic、Inspiring and exploratory academic spark，Ideological level、The level of countermeasures has reached a considerable level。

Xu Xianming, director of the Legal Education Steering Committee of the Ministry of Education, pointed out，Jurisprudence is a discipline that explores judicial concepts、The emerging discipline of bet365 live casino and sports bettingjudicial system and judicial practice，has broad development prospects。After development in recent years，has become an independent、A growing discipline，By exploring judicial traditions、Judicial Concept、Judicial system、Judicial Practice，Summary of judicial management rules，Explore judicial operation procedures，Studying the difficult problems of judicial reform，Deepened the academic community’s knowledge and understanding of judicial issues。Continuously developing the judicial discipline system，It is to meet the requirements of strengthening legal education and training of legal talents，It also helps to promote the construction of contemporary judicial civilization in China，Thus promoting the process of modernization of Chinese-style rule of law。Under the strategic deployment of the central government，my country’s judicial reform、The cause of judicial construction moves forward steadily，Continue to deepen，Has touched upon the deep-seated issues of the judicial system，This also puts forward higher requirements and deeper expectations for the development of judicial science。Shandong University is a university with a long history、Complete subjects、Strong national key universities，In recent years，Through platform construction、Talent gathering、Attach importance to the development of emerging disciplines and interdisciplinary disciplines，Promoted the sudden rise of the legal discipline，The overall strength of the discipline has greatly increased。It is becoming a force that cannot be ignored in the current layout of law disciplines in universities in my country，It has played a role that cannot be underestimated in promoting my country’s legal education and academic research。The soon-to-be-established Judicial Research Center of Shandong University will surely become a high-end platform for judicial theoretical research、An important think tank that promotes judicial reform and judicial practice，Putting the discipline construction of judicial science into a new journey、Towards a higher level。

Assistant to the President of Shandong University、Xing Zhanjun, deputy secretary of the Party Working Committee of Qingdao Campus, said in his speech，Shandong University warmly congratulates the convening of this judicial forum，I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all the leaders and experts who have provided long-term support to Shandong University。He pointed out that the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China emphasized insisting on comprehensively promoting the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation through Chinese-style modernization，The modernization of the rule of law is an important part of Chinese modernization，It is also an important guarantee for promoting Chinese-style modernization，Judicial reform and legislation、Law enforcement is also an important means to promote the modernization of the rule of law，Therefore, it is necessary to study the modernization of the Chinese-style rule of law from the perspective of judicial reform。bet365 app has been attracting and cultivating talents in recent years、Scientific research、Obvious achievements have been made in discipline construction and other aspects，Strong development momentum。For example, Distinguished Professor Cui Yongdong of our school and his judicial science team，Promoting the high-quality development of our school’s legal disciplines, especially the judicial discipline、Made outstanding contributions to the construction of a national legal think tank platform，At the same time, it also provides conceptual guidance and intellectual support for the development of my country’s judicial reform。On the new journey of comprehensively building a modern socialist country，Shandong University and the legal discipline must shoulder the mission of the new era，Vigorously leverage the advantages of a comprehensive university，Promote the cross-integration of legal disciplines and related disciplines,Continue to promote Chinese characteristics、Chinese style、Construction of a Chinese-style discipline system，Strive to create a new situation for the connotative and high-quality development of schools and disciplines。Next step，The school will fully support the development of emerging legal disciplines including jurisprudence，Vigorously promote the construction of new think tanks。I hope the law school will continue to carry forward the tradition，Leverage your strengths，Pursue excellence，Seize the day，Continuously improve the influence of Shandong University’s law and other disciplines in academic circles and society，To strengthen the legal discipline system with Chinese characteristics、Academic System、The construction of the discourse system has contributed great wisdom and strength，Provide Shandong University discourse and Shandong University plans for "Government of China" and "Good Law and Good Governance"。

President of Shanghai Law Society、Cui Yadong, Secretary of the Party Leadership Group, pointed out in his speech，Judicial science is a subject with great development prospects，Not only has great practical significance，It also has important academic value and theoretical significance。The development and improvement of the judicial system，Not only can it enrich the subject system of law，And it can optimize the knowledge structure of legal talents，It can also provide academic guidance and intellectual support for judicial reform and judicial practice。In recent years，The Judicial Science Research Institute of East China University of Political Science and Law is led by Professor Cui Yongdong，Achieved impressive results，Not only held 6 consecutive national judicial forums，Has a wide range of influence in the industry，And also published a series of readings on judicial research，It will also conduct scientific research、Combining talent training with think tank platform construction，In addition to achieving fruitful academic results, it has also achieved remarkable results in decision-making consulting services，The institute’s successful selection into the China CTTI Think Tank is proof of this。By the twenty-big east wind，Shandong University Judicial Research Center came into being，I hereby sincerely wish that the center will become bigger and stronger in the future，And I wish the discipline of judicial science continues to develop and grow！I will continue to support the judicial team led by Professor Cui Yongdong，And strengthen the relationship between Shanghai Law Society and bet365 app、Cooperation and exchange between the Judicial Research Center of Shandong University。

Former President of Shandong Provincial Higher People’s Court、Zhou Yuhua, member of the Steering Committee of the Supreme People's Court, pointed out in his speech，Carry out legal modernization and judicial reform，First of all, we must strengthen the research on the basic theories of jurisprudence，The current rule of law construction and judicial reform have entered deep waters，No way to cross the river by relying on stones，If you really want to cross the river, you can only build a boat or build a bridge first，The study of justice is shipbuilding and bridge building。He suggested that current research on judiciary should start from the basic theory of judiciary、Start with basic concepts，Let’s figure it out first，What is justice，What is law enforcement，How to define the concept，How to divide responsibilities，How to define the boundaries of power，What are the principles and rules that everyone should follow, etc.。The issue of the distinction between justice and law enforcement is not resolved，Construction of the rule of law、There are many theoretical obstacles to judicial reform。

In the theme reporting stage，Deputy Chairman of the Constitution and Law Committee of the National People’s Congress、Jiang Bixin, former Vice President of the Supreme People’s Court，Former Executive Vice President of Renmin University of China、First-level professor Wang Liming and more than 30 experts and scholars gave speeches。

Jiang Bixin’s report is titled “Chinese-Style Legal Modernization and Judicial Reform”。He pointed out，There is a modernization problem with Chinese-style rule of law，This can be seen from the meaning of the rule of law itself、Bet365The concept of Chinese-style rule of law、The need to build a rule of law China needs to be demonstrated from three aspects。The relationship between judicial reform and modernization of the rule of law，should be understood as the modernization of the rule of law including judicial modernization，Judiciary is the central link of the rule of law，Judicial reform should be combined with the entire rule of law reform、Unify、Work together。Fair, authoritative and efficient socialist justice，The core must not only ensure fairness and efficiency，There must also be special institutional arrangements for building an authoritative judicial system。You cannot use the independence of the court to exclude the independence of judges，Relevant supporting systems should be adopted to ensure that judges correctly exercise their judicial powers，Ensure that judicial power is not abused。

Zhang Yuejin, the former deputy mayor of Suzhou City, gave a speech on the "Maple Bridge Experience"，The title of the report is "Adhering to and developing the "Maple Bridge Experience" in the new era---Powering Chinese-style modernization with effective social governance"。He pointed out，The "Maple Bridge Experience" in the new era is very operable，Must grasp the essentials and implement them in conjunction with actual conditions；The creation and development of "Maple Bridge Experience" is the result of long-term exploration and practice at the grassroots level，The core is the unremitting efforts of grassroots social governance workers to keep pace with the times，We must focus on the construction of grassroots backbone teams while promoting the modernization of grassroots social governance；The key to practicing the "Maple Bridge Experience" in the new era is to lay a solid foundation at the grassroots level，We must attach great importance to the construction of grassroots social governance workers from a strategic perspective，Improving quality and capabilities through comprehensive and systematic vocational training。

Luo Qingdong, Deputy Director of the First Procuratorate of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, gave a speech on "China's Criminal Justice Reform in the New Era" from a prosecutorial perspective。He pointed out ten years，The procuratorial organs coordinate with political and legal departments to comprehensively implement Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law，Actively promote criminal justice reform，Focus on cracking down on the impact on judicial justice、Institutional obstacles that restrict judicial capabilities、Deep-seated issues，obvious results，Including actively promoting changes in judicial concepts，Vigorously promote the reform of the procuratorial system and mechanisms，Work hard to promote criminal procedure reform。Procuratorial Reform、Judicial reform is only in progress but not completed，The Party Central Committee issued the "Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Strengthening the Legal Supervision of Procuratorates in the New Era"，The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China insists on comprehensively adhering to the rule of law，Comprehensive arrangements have been made to promote the construction of China under the rule of law，Proposed clear requirements for the next step of procuratorial reform and judicial reform，Points out the direction of development。

Deputy Director of the Case Management Office of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate、Weng Yueqiang, Chief Procurator of the People’s Procuratorate of Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, made a report titled “Digital Prosecution Promotes Social Governance”。He pointed out，The Party Central Committee attaches great importance to governing the country according to law，Give the procuratorial organs greater political and historical responsibilities in the new era。The Supreme People’s Procuratorate implements big data strategy，Promoting digital inspection is to adapt to informatization、Digital、The trend of intelligent development，Use big data to promote the reshaping change of legal supervision from passive supervision to active prosecution。Digital inspection is the practice of digital empowerment supervision，Legal supervision model to promote governance。Through big data analysis、Compare and find clues to similar cases，Then discover the deep-seated problems in law enforcement and justice and the loopholes in the supervision of administrative agencies。By urging relevant functional departments to establish rules and regulations，Eliminate gaps and gaps in supervision，Go out of one case handling、Supervision of similar cases、New path of procuratorial supervision of system governance。

Sun Hailong, Vice President of Chongqing Higher People’s Court, gave a report entitled “Adhere to the Holistic Judicial View，Comprehensively and accurately implement the judicial accountability system》。He pointed out，We must persist in grasping and giving full play to the role of fair justice in the sixteen-character rule of law in the new era；Unswervingly adhere to the goal of reforming the judicial system to be fair, efficient, authoritative；Insisting on “let the judge judge” in the reform of judicial accountability system，The referee shall be responsible” and the reform requirement remains unchanged；Insist on focusing on the reform and construction of the judicial restriction and supervision and responsibility system，To be implemented and effective。

Vice President Lu Shangxian of the Higher People’s Court of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region gave a speech on the judicial accountability system，The report is titled "Comprehensive and Accurate Implementation of the Judicial Accountability System"，Promote the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law》。He pointed out，The modernization of the Chinese-style rule of law is an inevitable requirement for realizing the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities，Is an important guarantee for realizing the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation。Chinese-style modernization，It must be the rule of law in national governance，It must be to give full play to the rule of law and consolidate the foundation、Stable expectations、Modernization to benefit long-term security。Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China，Major progress has been made in the comprehensive supporting reform of the judicial system focusing on judicial accountability，But there are also cases where judicial responsibilities are not implemented、Inconsistency between delegation and supervision、New situations and new problems such as insufficient guarantee for the operation of judicial power。Promote the implementation of judicial accountability system in the new era and new stage，Must understand and grasp the scientific connotation of "comprehensive" and "accurate" judicial accountability system。Judicial accountability is a logically complete system、Mechanism system with scientific connotation，The content mainly includes reforming the operating mechanism of trial power、Clear the responsibilities and authorities of judicial personnel、Identification and investigation of trial liability、Strengthening judges’ duty performance and other four aspects。From an accuracy perspective，Properly handle delegation and supervision、The relationship between punishment and security is the key to accurately implementing the judicial accountability system。Comprehensively and accurately implement the judicial accountability system，The following reform measures should continue to be deepened: First, we must speed up the improvement of the new trial power operating mechanism；The second is to improve the performance file system of judicial personnel in the court；The third is to highlight the supervision and guidance functions of the “Examination Committee” and the “Judges’ Council”；The fourth is to accelerate the substantive operation of the judge’s disciplinary system；The fifth is to establish a scientific judge performance evaluation system；The sixth is to improve the trial power operation mechanism with the trial team as the core。

The report by Wang Yuefei, former vice-president of Hebei Provincial Higher People's Court, is titled "The Fit between Judiciary and Philosophy: Perceiving the Glory and Infinite Power of Philosophy in Judiciary"。He pointed out，Judiciary is an effective way to assume state functions，Bet365 Online Live DealerBoth the flexible means and rigid measures of justice are inseparable from the guidance of philosophy，Depends on the grasp of philosophical principles；Philosophy guides the scientific understanding of facts and evidence in justice；Marxist Theory of Contradiction analyzes the causes of contradictions from a philosophical perspective、Rules and solutions，Provided guidance to the judiciary；The inference process of judicial adjudication embodies dialectics，In fact determination、Marxist methodology must be reflected in reasoning and judgment results。

Xi Jianlin, President of the People's Court of Minhang District, Shanghai, gave a report titled "How to Integrate Socialist Core Values ​​into Judicial Adjudication，Strive to improve the capabilities and level of Chinese-style rule of law modernization》。He pointed out，Promote the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law，We must insist on deepening the reform of the judicial system，Judicial accountability reform is the focus and benchmark of judicial reform。Improving the socialist trial operation system with Chinese characteristics with judicial accountability as the core，Greatly enhances judicial initiative。But in order to improve the public’s perception of judicial fairness、Awareness，It is necessary to continue to improve the quality of judicial documents，In the process，It is particularly important to integrate socialist core values ​​into judicial documents。Integrate socialist core values ​​into judicial decisions，Must be transformed on the basis of hermeneutics，Not only must it be transformed into a language paradigm that legal professionals abide by，And it must be transformed into a thinking method that is generally understood by judges。Can transform socialist core values ​​into common sense language paradigms and ways of thinking，For example, the kindness that justice should possess is to respect the simple moral sentiments of the public，The law is not forceful，Punishment is not the purpose of justice、It’s a means，In referee，Criminal judges must remain humble，Civil judges must maintain sincerity，Executive judges must be in good faith。Studying such common sense expressions can help referees understand the essence of socialist core values，And integrate it into judicial decisions。

The title of Wang Shirong’s report, former deputy director of the Office of Judicial Reform of the Supreme People’s Court, is “Overseas Version of “Maple Bridge Experience” for Diversified Resolution of Overseas Chinese-Related Disputes”。He pointed out，Overseas Chinese-related disputes refer to disputes between Chinese citizens and overseas Chinese。Multinational、The existence of cross-border and other factors，As a result, disputes such as cultural conflicts and judicial sovereignty need to be faced in the process of resolving such disputes，Effectively resolving disputes faces many difficulties，For example, long duration、High litigation costs for the parties。The Overseas Chinese Federation (referred to as "Overseas Chinese Federation") is a semi-official non-governmental organization，It is the link to communicate and connect overseas Chinese，Should play an active role in resolving disputes involving overseas Chinese。In Qingtian County, known as the "Hometown of Overseas Chinese"，The main methods for resolving overseas Chinese-related disputes include: the Overseas Chinese Federation setting up domestic mediation organizations，As the court’s foreign-related judicial liaison platform，Hiring overseas Chinese leaders、Influential lawyers among overseas Chinese serve as mediators；For cases brought to court，The mediator will serve as a juror in the trial，Or attend the trial，Assume the responsibility of guiding both parties to negotiate。Diverse ways to resolve disputes involving overseas Chinese、Flexible method。Diversified resolution of overseas Chinese-related disputes is conducive to realizing the efficiency requirements of modern society for dispute resolution，Use the power of various organizations to resolve disputes，Play mediation、The role of arbitration and other non-litigation methods，Form more consensus。The resolution of disputes involving overseas Chinese is an object worthy of judicial research。

The participating scholars agreed，Chinese-style legal modernization cannot be separated from judicial modernization，And judicial modernization must rely on the high-level construction of judicial disciplines with China’s independent legal knowledge base。The establishment of the Judicial Research Center of Shandong University，It is of great significance in the historical process of domestic judicial discipline construction。"Comprehensive rule of law，Promoting the construction of China under the rule of law requires using China’s independent legal knowledge system to promote the reform and development of legal education。Judicial science is an ancient but young discipline，Since the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period，China’s ancient judicial system and wisdom have become an important part of Chinese civilization。Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences Independent Knowledge System Project，Chinese legal independent knowledge system is at the forefront of reform and exploration。

The discipline construction of judicial science in China is a very important systematic project。Including not only the independent construction of the judicial knowledge system、Inheriting and developing a first-class judicial research team，Also includes a high-end talent training project with independent knowledge of Chinese-style rule of law。Also see，Judicial discipline construction is not just about building a platform for talent training and academic exchange，It is also a high-end think tank platform that creates a platform for advising on politics and educating the people。In view of this，The Judicial Research Center inherits and develops the original experience and resources in building CTTI high-end think tanks，Integrated judicial science discipline team，Submit think tank results with decision-making reference value to provinces, cities and the country，Highlights Shandong University’s outstanding social service functions for the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law。

Distinguished Professor of Shandong University、Director of the Judicial Research Center、Cui Yongdong, director of the Shandong Provincial Judicial Research Base, made an academic summary at the end of the forum and talked about his understanding and experience on the four sub-topics。First, on the basic elements of Chinese-style rule of law modernization。Comprehensive of many relevant articles in the academic community and the opinions of experts speaking at this forum，It can be said that the basic elements of Chinese-style rule of law modernization include party leadership、People first、Good laws and good governance、Renovation and innovation、Technological support、Human and nature coexist harmoniously、Guided by the common values ​​of all mankind, etc.。

The second is about how judicial reform promotes the modernization of the Chinese-style rule of law。This is mainly reflected in the following three points，First, continuously strengthen judicial protection of human rights，Because the judicial protection of human rights embodies the concept of people’s supremacy，The supremacy of the people is precisely one of the basic elements of Chinese-style rule of law modernization。The second is to continuously promote judicial technology，Deeply integrate judicial rationality and technological rationality，“Give the wings of science and technology” to judicial progress。The third is to continuously improve the systemic and overall nature of judicial reform。

The third is the relationship between the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law and the inheritance of China’s excellent traditional legal culture。Chinese-style rule of law modernization is a modernization of the rule of law with Chinese characteristics，This "Chinese characteristics" is endowed to a certain extent by traditional Chinese legal culture，And excellent traditional legal culture can play a positive role in promoting the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law。For example，The Confucian theory of "benevolence" is today's human rights、The cultural basis of humanitarianism；There is also an internal ideological connection between the traditional theory of "prolonging rituals and emphasizing law" and today's theory of the simultaneous use of morality and law；The Taoist theory of "harmony Bet365between man and nature" is the spiritual origin of today's theory of harmonious coexistence between man and nature；Legalism’s strictness in governing officials、Judicial equality、The views of responsible justice and credit justice are also consistent with today’s concept of the rule of law；etc.。

Fourth, the integration of socialist core values ​​into judicial practice。At present, judicial authorities in various places have begun active exploration，Integrity、Justice、Equality、Core values ​​such as freedom are being widely introduced into judicial practice，There are many cases in this regard，has attracted widespread attention。In this regard，Not only has successful practical experience，And also has rich institutional experience。The academic community should theoretically refine and academically sublimate this issue。It should be noted，Socialist core values ​​successfully entered judicial practice，Is an important part of realizing the modernization of Chinese-style rule of law。

Jurisprudence is a discipline that explores judicial concepts、The knowledge of bet365 live casino and sports bettingjudicial system and judicial practice，It is also a science that explores judicial tradition and its modern transformation，At the same time, it also summarizes the rules of judicial management、Explore judicial operation procedures、Demonstrating judicial reform。The discipline of judicial science studies the exercise of judicial power and the system that assists the exercise of judicial power、Issues such as mechanisms and methods。From the nature of the subject，Judicial science has both intersectionality and independence: it intersects with other disciplines，Borrow perspectives and methods from other disciplines to study judicial issues，Derived judicial philosophy、Judicial Administration、Judicial management and other branches；has independent intrinsic value and status，Performance in Judicial Institutions、Judicial philosophy and other branches。From the perspective of research scope，Judicial science is the study of national justice，Also studies social justice。Traditional theory emphasizes the state’s monopoly on justice or judicial power，Too simple in connotation，Judicial science has overcome the limitations of traditional theory，Taking judicial dualism as its basic theory，Study the national judiciary with three major lawsuits as the main content，Also research includes "Maple Bridge Experience"、Social justice including diversified dispute resolution mechanisms and other systems，Pay attention to the use of social power to resolve disputes。From the perspective of research methods，Judicial science emphasizes the combination of theory and practice，Combining tradition and reality，The combination of ideas and systems。In academic style，Jurisprudence has a grand narrative，Carry out abstract theoretical research from the level of top-level design，Provide more theoretical support for judicial reform；There are also exquisite craftsmanship，Study and improve specific systems in judicial practice by focusing on details。Anyway，Judicial science is different from procedural law，is a new subject growth point，It is also the theoretical footing of judicial reform practice。The discipline of judicial science is explored by scholars such as Professor Cui Yongdong，Has produced a series of results such as "Principles of Judicial Science", "Outline of Judicial Science", "Judicial Science Research Series", "Judicial Science Research Series"，The discipline of judicial science has both theoretical depth and practical significance，Broad prospects，There is a lot to be done，will continue to thrive。

From 2014，Under the leadership of Dean Cui Yongdong，The only substantial scientific research institution in China at that time - Institute of Judicial Science, East China University of Political Science and Law，The first high-end academic platform for judicial theoretical and practical research in China - National Judicial Forum。The Judicial Science Forum has been held in Shanghai、Qinzhou, Guangxi、Linfen, Shanxi、Zhejiang Wencheng、Suzhou, Jiangsu successfully held six sessions，is a well-known brand in forums related to the judicial field in my country。Previous forums focused on judicial reform、Judicial management and its reform、Judicial Theory and Practice、Reform of the judicial committee system、Supervisory Committee System Reform、Judicial Accountability、Legal Professional Community、Reform of the operational mechanism of judicial power in the western region、Diversified resolution mechanism for overseas Chinese-related disputes、Discuss new developments in China’s judicial theory and practice in the new era，Previous forums have brought together domestic universities、Top scholars and experts from scientific research institutions and judicial practice departments，Produced a number of research results that are of guiding significance to top-level design and local judicial reform practice。

This forum also marks the upcoming establishment of the Judicial Research Center of Shandong University。The Judicial Research Center is the successor of the Judicial Research Institute (CTTI Think Tank)、Development and sublimation。Under the leadership of the school and law school，The center will be committed to building a judicial science discipline base and a first-class academic exchange platform in Shandong and even the country。Supported by the excellent discipline construction and resources of 985 universities，Professor Cui Yongdong, director of the center, recruits and forms a first-class scientific research team，Push judicial research to a higher level。Afterwards，The Judicial Research Center of Shandong University will be committed to promoting the development of the Judicial Science discipline of Shandong University and the construction of a think tank platform，A National Judicial Forum will be held every year，Creating an Shandong University brand with profound theoretical and practical significance and strong disciplinary influence。

Text

Audit