December2日，Professor Best slot on Bet365Shunjun Ishizuka of Yamanashi University, Japan, gave an academic Bet365 lotto review entitled "Japanese Constitution in Judicial Practice" in the conference room on the first floor of the Law School Teaching Building。Reported byBet365 lotto review SchoolBet365 lotto review Mou Xiankui presided over,Vice DeanAssociate Professor Jiang Feng made wonderful comments on the Bet365 lotto review.
This Bet365 lotto review mainly focuses on judicial independence and the unconstitutional review system。Professor Junjun Ishizuka first raised the two recent unconstitutional review judgments made by the Supreme Court of Japan，All are in violation of Article 1 of the Constitution of Japan14itemsAll citizens are equal before the Bet365 lotto reviewProposed for the reason。One is about the issue of differential treatment of inheritance of children born out of wedlock。Another issue is the election of members of Congress。Next，Professor Shunjun Ishizuka gave a brief explanation of some judicial contents in the Constitution of Japan。And believes that the constitution actually adopts appearance constitutionalism。Then，Professor Shunjun Ishizuka gave a detailed explanation on the independence Bet365 sportsbook reviewof judicial power，Considering that judges are not subject to other interference，Independent exercise of judicial power。Most scholars in Japan believe that an American-style unconstitutional review system should be adopted。There are limits to judicial power in the Constitution，Such as the trial of disputes over the qualifications of members of Congress、Impeachment Court, etc.。Also running，There are many situations that the court cannot judge，Like the Self-Defense Forces，U.S.-Japan treaty and refugee issues, etc.。To sum up，Japan mainly adopts judicial passivism，That is, negative judgment is unconstitutional，Because most people think，Once an unconstitutional judgment is made，Easy to cause political chaos。After the report ends，Students discussed the two conditions that constitute Japan’s unconstitutionality、Question on the contradiction between appearance constitutionalism and judicial passivism，Professor Junjun Ishizuka also gave details，Patient answer。Last，Associate Professor Jiang Feng made a wonderful comment on the report and expressed his own views on judicial Bet365 lotto reviewindependence and constitutional review，It has also benefited everyone。
This Bet365 lotto review has successfully promoted exchanges and learning between Chinese and Japanese academics in the field of constitutional law，Deepen the further cooperation between the two parties in academic and teaching，The Bet365 lotto review ended successfully with everyone’s warm applause。
Author:Text/Zhang JiePicture/李玺
