April 24, 2010，By China Constitutional Society、The "Fourth International Academic Symposium on the Current Situation and Development Trends of East Asian Public Law" jointly sponsored by the Korean Comparative Public Law Society and bet365 app was grandly held in the conference hall of the office building of the Central Campus of Shandong University。Top scholars from the public law circles of China and South Korea gathered together，Carried out in-depth discussions on many issues including the current status and future development trends of public law in East Asia。Professor Gao Wenxuan of Soongsil University School of Law, South Korea、Professor Lin Ming, Vice President of bet365 app, presided over the opening ceremony。President of the Korean Comparative Public Law Society、Professor Yoo Si-cho of Busan University of Foreign Studies represents the Korean Society of Comparative Public Law，President of the Chinese Constitutional Society、Professor Han Dayuan, Dean of the Law School of Renmin University of Bet365China, represents the Chinese Constitutional Studies Association，Professor Fan Jinxue, Vice President of bet365 App, delivered a brief speech at the opening ceremony on behalf of Bet365 App.。This international academic seminar is divided into three units，Respectively, "The Public Legal Significance of Social Harmony"、"Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Development"、Discuss the theme of "Public Governance and Administrative Rule of Law"。

    The theme of the first unit is "The Public Legal Significance of Social Harmony"，Professor Kim Bae-won from Pusan ​​National University Law School、Hosted by Professor Li Shuzhong from the School of Law, China University of Political Science and Law，Professor Lee Dong-hoon, Semyung University School of Law, Korea、Professor Jiang Jinsong from the School of Law, Central University of Finance and Economics serves as a reviewer。A total of four professors have made relevant academic reports on this。

    First，Professor Choi Kyung-ok of Yeongsan University School of Bet365 Online Live DealerLaw in South Korea gave a report entitled "Korean Multiculturalism from a Constitutional Perspective"。Professor Choi Kyung-ok explained multiculturalism in the sense of the Korean Constitution from the perspective of concepts and development trends，And discusses three related human rights issues in the multicultural phenomenon in Korea: the issue of nationality acquisition for marriage immigrants、Problems of educating children in multicultural families、Human rights issues of foreign workers。Subsequently，bet365 appProfessor Wang Dezhi gave a report entitled "The Constitutional Dimension of Modern Confucianism"。Professor Wang Dezhi discusses the basics of human nature、Individualism、A comparative discussion between the Constitution and Confucianism from the four aspects of liberalism and democracy，And advocates that constitutional law should absorb the wisdom of modern Confucianism，Find your spiritual home in China。Next，Professor Bang Seung-joo of Hanyang University College of Law in South Korea gave a report entitled "Alleviation of Social Disputes and the Constitution and Constitutional Judgment"。Professor Fang Shengzhu starts from the perspective of the victim’s right to request assistance，Introducing the current status and existing problems of crime victims’ right to request assistance in South Korea，Mainly the territorialism and reciprocity upheld by the Crime Victims Assistance Law，There is suspicion of constitutional violation。last，Professor Lin Laifan of Tsinghua University School of Law gave a report entitled "Human Dignity and Personal Dignity - Also on the Interpretation Plan of Article 38 of the Chinese Constitution"，further elaborates on the "dual normative meaning of the personal dignity clause"，Thinks that Article 38 of China’s current Constitution is divided by periods，The previous paragraph can be understood as a relatively independent normative statement，Express the principle that "human dignity" has fundamental value；The latter paragraph and the previous paragraph combine to form a whole normative statement，Combined into a guarantee clause for individual rights equivalent to constitutional personality rights。
 
    The theme of the second unit is "Basic Rights and Constitutional Development"，Professor Park In-soo, Yeongnam University Law School、Hosted by Professor Lin Feng from the School of Law, City University of Hong Kong，Professor Kim Hae-yong, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Law School、Professor Bang Seung-joo, Hanyang University Law School, South Korea、Professor Wang Jinyuan of Southeast University School of Law serves as a reviewer。A total of four professors have made relevant academic reports on this。

    First，Professor Kim Kyung-ji of Dongguk University School of Bet365 Online Live DealerLaw in South Korea gave a report entitled "The Argument Method of Constitutional Judgment from the Determination of the Constitutionality of Death Penalty"。Two controversies surrounding the death penalty in South Korea，Professor Kim Kyung-je pointed out that the Korean Constitution recognizes the existence of "death penalty" as a punishment，Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Constitution bet365 live casino and sports bettingshall apply to the pronouncement of the death penalty，Having a negative impact on citizens’ right to life in accordance with the law and legal procedures。Subsequently，Professor Qin Qianhong of Wuhan University Law School gave a report entitled "China's Issues Concerning Basic Rights"。He reflected on the misunderstanding of the word "rights" in modern China，And further elaborated that this misunderstanding affects the understanding of fundamental rights, a basic category of the Constitution，Making basic rights a sourceless water in China。To this，Professor Qin Qianhong believes that a specialized constitutional review mechanism is needed to alleviate the current dilemma，And emphasizes that China’s constitutional theory should reflect “Chineseness”,In response to the challenges of social reality。Next，Professor Zou Pingxue of Shenzhen University Law School gave a report entitled "Analysis of the Legislative Model of Personal Information Protection in China"。Professor Zou Pingxue advocates a “unified legislative model” in response to the two current expert drafts on personal information protection legislation，expressed his different views: based on China’s existing legislative foundation and reality on power restrictions、Demand for rights protection，Legislation for personal information protection should adopt a “relatively decentralized legislative model”。last，Professor Yang Shilin of Jinan University Law School gave a report entitled "Problems Facing the Protection of Farmers' Basic Rights"。Professor Yang Shilin analyzed the problems faced in protecting farmers’ constitutional rights，And pointed out that the current lack of farmers’ rights and the lack of guarantees are not conducive to the normal operation and healthy development of Chinese society，Our country should improve the legal environment as soon as possible，To confirm and protect farmers’ growing rights needs，Treat farmers’ rights fairly。