11month27日Late，Professor of Suzhou University Law School、Dong Binghe, deputy director of Soochow Law Institute, is a guest at the Law School101The academic lecture hall brought a lecture titled " to the teachers and students present.TRIPSAcademic report on interpretation of the fourth paragraph of the preamble to the Agreement，The report was hosted by Professor Mao Yinghong。

Beginning of report,Dong BingheThe professor gave a brief introductionTRIPSBasic information on the fourth paragraph of the preamble of the Agreement. Next,Dong BingheThe professor divided the discussion into four partsTRIPSIn-depth interpretation of the fourth paragraph of the preamble of the Agreement:

First, interpretationTRIPSBackground to the fourth preambular paragraph of the Agreement. exist2004years ago，There is no controversy in academia Bet365about the private nature of intellectual property rights。In terms of legislation，China's "General Principles of Civil Law" stipulates intellectual property rights in Section 3 of Chapter 5 Civil Rights；Other countries such as1947Italian Civil Code and199517594_17610。From various doctrines andTRIPSLooking at the claims in the fourth paragraph of the preamble to the Agreement，All recognize the private nature of intellectual property rights。But2004Nianhe2005A debate in the year，Academia begins to discuss whether intellectual property rights are private rights or public rights，Mainly the theory of private rights、Three propositions: the theory of publicizing private rights and the theory of public rights。Although the debate ended quickly，But the impact is great。All parties in this debate have two common points: First, all parties advocate strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights，Use private rights to promote protection，Use public power to prevent over-protection。