2008Year11month5日Late，Professor Nakanishi Matazo, Graduate School of Law, Bet365Chuo University, Japan, at the School of Law114The classroom brought a wonderful report titled "New Trends in Japanese Administrative Law" to the teachers and students of our school。The report was hosted by Professor Li Daojun，By teacher of Zhejiang University Law School、Translated by Jiang Lihong, PhD in Law, Chuo University, Japan。

The report is mainly passed2004The revision of Japan’s Administrative Incident Litigation Law to introduce and discuss administrative relief issues in Japanese administrative law。Japan in1962The Administrative Incident Litigation Law was formulated in 15991_1600242Not modified during the year。This modification mainly includes the following aspects:

First，About the increase in types of protest litigation。In Japan，Administrative litigation is called protest litigation。04Year before modification，There are three main types of protest lawsuits in Japan: one is withdrawal litigation。Including disposition litigation and ruling litigation。The former refers to orders that harm nationals，Revocation action；The latter refers to when the counterparty is dissatisfied with the administrative action，File for reconsideration，A protest lawsuit filed when you are still dissatisfied bet365 casino live blackjackwith the reconsideration result。The second category is invalid confirmation litigation。That is, a lawsuit that requires the court to confirm invalid or non-existent administrative actions。The last category is litigation to confirm illegal omission。Refers to the lawsuit in which the administrative counterpart applies to the court to confirm that the inaction of the administrative agency is illegal，The requirements for withdrawing the lawsuit and invalidating the lawsuit must clearly indicate the exercise of public power，File a lawsuit regarding this conduct。Inaction without action does not constitute the exercise of public power。For example: the administrative counterpart files an application to obtain an administrative license，When administrative agencies fail to act without justifiable reasons，The counterparty can file a lawsuit for confirmation of illegal omission。

This legal revision adds two types of legal action and cessation of action。The former refers to when the administrative agency should act but fails to act，A lawsuit in which the counterparty requests the court to require the administrative agency to take certain actions。The latter means that the administrative agency will take actions that will cause harm to the Bet365 Online Live Dealercounterparty，The counterparty has the right to request the court to request the administrative agency to stop the lawsuit。Because the types of statutory protest actions cannot include all types of protest actions，This type of nameless protest lawsuit, or statutory extra-statutory protest lawsuit, is possible in theory and case law。The addition of these two lawsuits is the most important content of the revision of Japan’s Procedural Law，Of great significance。