10month22日Late7:00，The Fourth National Ten Outstanding Young Jurists、Vice President of the Criminal Procedure Law Research Association of the China Law Society、Professor Zuo Weimin, Executive Vice Dean of the Graduate School of Sichuan University, at the Law School101A lecture titled“Empirical Research and China’s Criminal Procedure Reform――Take investigation procedures as the main example”'s academic report. The report was hosted by Professor Zhou Changjun.

    Professor Zuo first explained the reasons for combining empirical research with China’s criminal procedure reform。First, although many scholars are studying China’s criminal procedure reform、narration，But not many use empirical research paradigm；Second, China’s legal research, especially the research on criminal procedure law, should change the existing research bet365 live online casinoparadigm。Using new empirical research paradigm to study criminal proceedings，You will have a new understanding of the existing problems and reform directions of China’s criminal proceedings。

    Next，Professor Zuo mainly discussed the reasons for conducting empirical research and the empirical results and reform enlightenment。

    First，On why empirical research is needed，Professor Zuo proposed the following three reasons:

    First，The existing theoretical research paradigm does not pay enough attention to the practical issues of criminal proceedings。Professor Zuo highlighted three existing theoretical research paradigms，Annotated Jurisprudence，Comparative Law and New Ideological Law。and pointed out，These three research paradigms have their own value and positive significance now and in the future，But it is not comprehensive、Pay close attention to and grasp the reality of China，Inability to adequately respond to the needs of criminal justice practice。