Recently，To showcase Bet365 lotto reviewthe innovative achievements of judicial protection of Bet365 Online Live Dealer rights in our courts，Improving my country’s Bet365 Online Live Dealer judicial protection system，Shanghai Bet365 Online Live Dealer Research Institute held the event"Selection of China's Top Ten Bet365 Online Live Dealer Judgment Cases with the Most Research Value in 2020"。After social recommendation、Expert nomination、Public voting and expert review，FinalizedChina’s top ten Bet365 Online Live Dealer adjudication cases with the most research value in 2020。

Among them, undergraduate from the School of Law1996Grade Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Ji Xiaoxin, the president of the Intellectual Property Court of Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court, serves as the presiding judge of the first-instance collegial panel，Bachelor of Law School1996Grade Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Liu Xiaohua, the president of the Third Civil Trial Division of the Shandong Provincial Higher People’s Court, serves as the presiding judge of the second-instance collegial panel"Heineken stopped implementing the accused design case"，Selected as one of China’s top ten Bet365 Online Live Dealer adjudication cases with the most research value in 2020。

Text/Yang Xiaochao

Audit/Man Hongjie

Case brief:

Plaintiff Heineken Brewery Co., Ltd. owns goods such as beer“Heineken” and “Heineken” word trademarks and word and graphic combination trademarks。Zhang Zengjian and other defendants registered the trademark "Hainaken"，And use logos such as "XILI", "xili", "HEINEKEN", "HAINEKEN", "Hainiken", "HAINIKEN", "Heineken" and "Heineken Beer" on beer products。The defendant also used a pattern similar to the plaintiff’s trademark、The name Bet365 Online Live Dealer infringing company is applied for as a design patent in beer packaging cans、On the packaging box，For production and operation。In addition to claiming to stop trademark infringement、Stop using the Heineken font size、Compensation for losses、Except civil liability for elimination of impact，Also filed a lawsuit requesting to prohibit the defendant from implementing its design patent。The key points Bet365 Online Live Dealer judgment in this case are，For the design patent obtained by the defendant，When the patent right is valid，Can I request the court to order the defendant to prohibit the defendant from exploiting the patent in a civil infringement case。In this case，The plaintiff requests that the defendant shall not implement the litigation request for infringement bet365 live casino and sports bettingof the plaintiff’s trademark rights and design patent rights，The court held that，The outer packaging Bet365 Online Live Dealer defendant’s products is very similar to the design，And the design uses a logo similar to the plaintiff’s trademark，If its use is not prohibited, the plaintiff’s legal rights will be damaged，The defendant was ordered not to exploit the design patent from the effective date Bet365 Online Live Dealer judgment。February 20, 2021，Shandong Provincial Higher People’s Court made a second-instance judgment and upheld the first-instance judgment。