Evening of October 14, 2020，The scholarly style lecture of the series of academic activities for the 40th anniversary of the resumption of the law discipline of Shandong University was successfully held online，Dr. Su Ying, a teacher at the School of Law, gave a wonderful Bet365 app downloadreport on the topic of "The Possibility and Limitations of Commercial Adjudication of Same Cases and Same Judgments"。Lecture hosted by Professor Man Hongjie，Associate Professor Yu Yongning participated in this lecture as a speaker。
The beginning of the lecture，Teacher Su Ying started an in-depth discussion on the topic of whether the same crime and the same verdict are a "myth" or an "ideal"。He elaborated on how to view the same case and the same verdict in theory，He listed Zhou Shaohua、Professor Sun Haibo’s different views on the issue of same verdict in the same case in related articles，believes that modern big data research has highlighted the importance of the same case and same verdict，Same crime and same verdict should be practiced as a legal ideal。
Teacher Su Ying summarized the three main types of judicial measures taken by the Supreme People's Court in promoting the goal of treating the same case in the same case: First, it implemented two programmatic guiding measures，That is, implement the case guidance system and require courts at all levels to add interpretation and reasoning components；The second is the introduction of a series of relevant rules and judicial interpretations；The third is to promote the establishment of a similar case search system。If these measures can be implemented，It plays a significant role in promoting the same judgment bet365 live online casinoin the same case and the fairness of judgment。
Teacher Su Ying discussed the differences in private and commercial thinking、Differences in legal interpretation、The impact of conflict of legal rules on the same verdict in the same case。On the impact of differences in civil and commercial thinking on the same verdict in the same case，The dormitory teacher analyzes specific cases，Point out that differences in thinking in civil and commercial matters will lead judges to reach different conclusions when trying the same case。In terms of the impact of differences in legal interpretation and conflicts of legal rules on the same verdict for the same case，Teacher Su Ying conducted an in-depth analysis based on the provisions of the "Company Law" and related cases。At the same time, he proposed that when there is a conflict between two currently valid legal rules，There are three resolution paths in judicial adjudication: Logical analysis of conflicts in the hierarchy of legal application，Logical reasoning and summary authorization。
Conversation session，Teacher Yu Yongning’s research purpose on the issue of same judgment in commercial adjudication、Existing limitations、Summary and outlook of the report from three perspectives of realizing possibilities。Teacher Man Hongjie spoke highly of the camp lecturer’s report，Considers that the research on the same judgment in commercial bet365 casino blackjackcases is of great significance in both theoretical and practical applications，The realization of the same verdict in the same case ultimately depends on the improvement of judicial methods，Trading Habits、Trading scenario、Differences and changes in national policies are factors that affect the realization of the same verdict for the same case in commercial cases。
Camp，bet365 app lecturer，Ph.D. in International Financial Law，Postdoctoral fellow in jurisprudence，Visiting scholar at Pennsylvania State University, USA，Distinguished Researcher at the Foreign Law Research Center of the China Institute of Applied Law, Supreme People’s Court，Partner of Beijing Deheng Law Firm (Jinan)。Main research direction: commercial law、International Financial Law。
Text/Meng Yuan
Picture/Liu Yu
Review/Man Hongjie
Editor/Shi Zhiqiang
