With the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law，my country's "Civil bet365 casino live blackjackProcedure Law"、The revision of the "Bet365 sportsbook review Procedure Law" is also in full swing。Currently，Some Bet365 sportsbook review law and Bet365 sportsbook review litigation law experts have proposed multiple draft revisions，Expressed different opinions on revision from various angles。April 17，A seminar to solicit opinions from experts on the draft revision of the "Bet365 sportsbook review Procedure Law" with Ying Songnian as the subject host was held at Beijing Cuigong Hotel。Professor Yang Haikun of our college participated in this seminar。Professor Yang Haikun thinks，This revised manuscript is based on many years of research，Systematic review of existing problems over the past thirty years since the implementation of the Bet365 sportsbook review Litigation Law，Proposed relatively comprehensive revision suggestions，We have gathered opinions from all aspects，Provides a better foundation for the revision of the "Bet365 sportsbook review Procedure Law"。But some issues deserve further discussion，In particular, the theoretical breakthroughs or "highlights" of this law need to be clearer，For example，People's Court hearing Bet365 sportsbook review cases，It is to review the legality of Bet365 sportsbook review actions，Still conducting legality review，Also conduct Bet365 app downloada rationality review，Still based on the principle of legality review、Supplemented by reasonableness review under special circumstances；How to determine the nature of obviously unreasonable behavior in the exercise of Bet365 sportsbook review discretion，This behavior is illegal，It is still illegal to reach a certain level，The cancellation or change of the act is a supplement to the legality review、Extend or treat as exception, etc.，Need to clarify。Zaru，About the handling of the relationship between Bet365 sportsbook review reconsideration and Bet365 sportsbook review litigation，It is also worth discussing based on practice，Professor Yang Haikun prefers to implement pre-review procedures，Conducive to self-correction of Bet365 sportsbook review agencies；At the same time，He advocates the reconsideration decision made by the reconsideration authority after the reconsideration，Regardless of whether the original Bet365 sportsbook review behavior is changed，As long as the review applicant is still dissatisfied with the review decision，The review agency should be the defendant，The original Bet365 sportsbook review agency should not be the defendant，Only when empowering the reconsideration authority bet365 casino blackjackand increasing its responsibilities，In order to prevent Bet365 sportsbook review reconsideration from being in vain，In order to focus the Bet365 sportsbook review litigation system，Handling a few difficult cases in which Bet365 sportsbook review agencies have not resolved Bet365 sportsbook review disputes due to various reasons，Thus improving the quality of Bet365 sportsbook review trials，Improving the authority of the judiciary。The seminar was very lively，Experts participating in the meeting spoke freely，Confronted various opinions，Deepened understanding，Contributes to the maturity of the revised draft of the law。