In order to implement the spirit of the Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Party、Further improve the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics，Sponsored by China Criminal Procedure Law Research Association、The 13th China-Korea International Symposium on Criminal Procedure Law - "Disposal of Property Involved in Criminal Procedure" hosted by Guangdong University of Foreign Studies was bet365 casino live blackjackrecently held in Guangzhou。From Chinese and Korean academic circles、Representative of the legal profession，Supreme People’s Procuratorate、Supreme People's Court、Guangdong Provincial People’s Procuratorate and Korea Criminal Justice Policy Research Institute、Seoul Eastern District Court、Experts from the Incheon District Prosecutor’s Office and other substantive departments of China and South Korea attended the meeting。

Executive Vice President of China Criminal Procedure Law Research Association、Chen Weidong, Wu Yuzhang Senior Chair Professor of Renmin University of China, presided over the opening ceremony。Shi Youqi, Secretary of the Party Committee of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies，Jing Dali, President of China Criminal Procedure Law Research Association，President of the Korean Criminal Procedure Law Research Association、Professor Kim Sung-yong of the Kyungpook National University School of Law delivered a speech。

The theme of the seminar is "Disposal of Property Involved in Criminal Procedures"，Focus on coercive measures against the property involved、Establish a relatively independent illegal income confiscation procedure、Independent illegal income confiscation procedures and illegal income certification issues、Discuss the management of the property involved and the disposal of the property involved in the digital era。

bet365 app、Professor Zhou Changjun, Dean of Law School (Weihai), was invited to attend the meeting，Served as a panellist for the unit "Independent Illegal Income Confiscation Procedures and Illegal Bet365 sportsbook reviewIncome Proof Issues"。Zhou Changjun mainly expressed four views: First，"Independent Confiscation Process"，Refers to confiscation proceedings without conviction，corresponds to the conviction and confiscation procedure。In China，Both types of confiscation procedures exist，That is, one type is independent、Exists as a special procedure for criminal proceedings、The suspect and the defendant escaped、Illegal income confiscation procedures in death cases，The scope of its applicable cases is limited；The other type is the conviction and confiscation procedure that is attached to conviction and sentencing and is applicable to most cases。Second，About the suspect、The defendant escaped、The nature of the confiscation procedure of illegal income in death cases，Very controversial in China。From the ""About the Application of Criminal Suspects"" issued by relevant leaders of the Supreme People's Court、The defendant escaped、Understanding and Application of Provisions on Several Issues in the Confiscation Procedure of Illegal Income in Death Cases""，The judicial authority believes that it is essentially an action to confirm rights，Maybe closer to civil procedure。Third，About the suspect、The defendant escaped、Standard basis for confiscation procedures of illegal income in death cases，There are three main ones: one is the Criminal Procedure Law，The second is the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court in 2021，The third is the "About Applicable Criminal Suspects" issued by the "Two Highs" in 2017、The defendant escaped、Provisions on Several Issues in the Confiscation Procedure of Illegal Income in Death Bet365 PokerCases》。From the provisions of these normative documents，The scope of crimes applicable to our country’s independent confiscation procedure is not only corruption, bribery and terrorism crimes，Also includes endangering national security、Smuggling、Money laundering、Financial Fraud、Underworld organized crime、Drug Crime、Telecom fraud crime、Internet fraud crime。Fourth，Standards of proof for illegal income confiscation procedures。In our country，From a normative perspective，In the illegal income confiscation procedure, the burden of proof is mainly borne by the procuratorate。The prosecutorial office needs to prove the correlation between the illegal gains applied for confiscation and the criminal facts，And meet the high probability standard，That is, the property applied for confiscation is highly likely to be illegal income or other property involved in the case，This is a provision of judicial interpretation。

Text｜From page 9 of "Rule of Law Daily" on October 16, 2024

Picture｜The 13th China-Korea International Symposium on Criminal Procedure Law Conference Group

Audit