Days ago，By Human Rights Research Center of Shandong University、The Second Empirical Law Youth Academic Salon jointly organized by Hunan University Mathematical and Quantitative Law Research Center and Sichuan University Key Laboratory of Empirical Law and Smart Rule of Law was held in Changsha City, Hunan Province。
from Oklahoma State University、Sam Houston State University、Old Dominion University、Tulane University、Wayne State University、George Mason University、University of Massachusetts、Tsinghua University、Peking University、Sichuan University、Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Zhejiang University、Shandong University、Central South University、Hunan University、University of International Business and Economics、Southwestern University of Finance and Economics、Guangdong University of Foreign Studies、Zhejiang City University and other domestic and foreign universities、Experts and scholars from scientific research institutes，"Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)" Editorial Department、Experts from the editorial department of "Huxiang Legal Review" and other units participated in this discussion。
Beginning of meeting，Editor-in-Chief of "Huxiang Legal Review"、Professor Qu Maohui of Hunan University Law School gave the opening speech，A warm welcome to all the guests participating in this academic salon，Expressing deep expectations for young Bet365 lotto reviewscholars at home and abroad to participate in empirical legal research。
This year’s Empirical Law Youth Academic Salon takes “Perspectives of Legal Empirical Research: Domestic and International” as its central theme，Divided into "Quantitative Legal Research: Similarities and Differences between Domestic and International Perspectives", "Qualitative Legal Research: Similarities and Differences between Domestic and International Perspectives" and "How to Face the Challenges of the Digital Age？Contribution of domestic and international perspectives" and other three major topics，Young Bet365 lotto reviewscholars at home and abroad focus on data openness、Journal publication、Focus issues such as the value of two types of empirical research methods，A heated debate took place in a tense and lively atmosphere。
Bet365 lotto review
Zhang Chuanxi, a distinguished associate researcher at the City College of Zhejiang University, presided over the first topic，Assistant Professor Yijia Lu from George Mason University in the United States first started with legal education at home and abroad、Interdisciplinary research between law and other disciplines、Sharing the diversity and limitations of research methods, changes and challenges in research methods, etc.。
Hu Changming, associate researcher at the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, further studies the current status of interdisciplinary research between domestic law and other disciplines、Difficulties in publishing empirical legal research articles、This paper summarizes the similarities and differences of empirical legal research at home and abroad in terms of the difficulty of empirical legal research and the training system of empirical legal research, as well as the challenges in the domestic research field。
Associate Professor Xia Yiwei, School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, responded to the views of Teacher Lu Yijia and Teacher Hu Changming from the perspective of empirical legal research and the dilemma of SSCI submission。Combined with my past review experience，Associate Professor Xia Yiwei believes that the proportion of domestic scholars citing English literature is low、Poor translation quality，It is recommended that young scholars actively participate in international academic dialogue、Find the global significance and contribution of the research topic；And through emerging methods such as crowdfunding，Establish a shared data channel，Acquired for empirical research、Data module for quantitative research, etc.，With the cooperation of strengthening the training of empirical research teachers and improving the level of empirical research education，Promote the effective development of domestic legal empirical research。
In discussion，Proposed by Professor He Haibo of Tsinghua University School of Law，Young scholars in empirical legal research can organize workshops，First draft of discussion paper，We can even discuss framework ideas。You can express your opinions freely in the workshop、Help each other polish the papers。This online working method enables effective collaboration，Avoid legal research from falling into blind depth and complexity，Effectively improve the quality of articles。Teacher He Haibo agreed with Teacher Xia Yiwei’s views，Additional explanation，There are differences in topic preferences between domestic and international journals，Scholars should pay attention to and pay attention to the academic aesthetic preferences of different types of journals。
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Wayne State University,Siying Guo, assistant professor at Wayne State University, Su Jie, editor bet365 live online casinoof "Journal of Shandong University (Social Science Edition)" and other scholars also participated in the discussion。
Topic 2: Qualitative legal research: similarities and differences between domestic and international perspectives
Mr. Wang Zhong, assistant professor of Hunan University Law School, served as the moderator of topic two，And first shared his experience and confusion in the process of engaging in qualitative legal research and article submission，Recognized that qualitative research and quantitative research have the same important status，And further invited guests to share different views。
Department of Sociology, Tulane University, Assistant Professor Xin Jiang from Tulane University analyzed the limitations of quantitative research、The importance of qualitative research and the necessity of combining the two，Encourage scholars to actively carry out quantitative and qualitative research methods，Breakthrough the limitations of the two research methods，Promote and facilitate the development of academic research。
Xin Yanyu, a lecturer at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, uses his past experience in quantitative analysis of criminal judgments，Considers that judgment documents can serve as an effective bridge to integrate qualitative and quantitative research，Promote mixed research methods to compensate for the limitations of a single method、Promote the comprehensiveness of research results。
Associate Professor Xiaojin Chen of Tulane University expresses preference for qualitative research，Think that blindly pursuing quantitative analysis may be divorced from reality，leading to the conclusion "cold"；Qualitative research can sometimes reveal some hidden details in the argumentation process。Associate Professor Chen Xiaojin pointed out，Promote and carry out legal research by combining quantitative research and qualitative research，Can promote scholars to be more comprehensive、Understand the problem deeply、Revealing the complex diversity of society，More practical value。
Professor Zeng Yun, School of Law, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, starts from the definition of qualitative research，The importance of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research for high-quality research is elaborated through simple and easy-to-understand examples。Professor Zeng Yun also shared his experience in quantitative analysis methods and qualitative empirical research，Discussed with the young scholars attending the meeting the specific application of the two research methods in legal research and their relationship。
Topic 3: How to face the challenges of the digital age？Contribution from domestic and international perspectives
Teacher Zhou Wenzhang from the Human Rights Research Center of Shandong University presided over the discussion on topic three，Based on the challenges of the digital age, "Where are the boundaries of the challenges of the digital age?"？” and “How to meet the challenges of the digital age？”Two major questions。
Associate researcher Zhou Xiang, a distinguished researcher at Zhejiang University, thinks，Artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT can effectively promote the automation bet365 live casino and sports bettingof data analysis，Empirical researchers, especially young scholars, will face the challenge of limited development space and living space。
Mr. Liu Xing, a lecturer at Hunan Technology and Business University, combined with his own experience in using digital technologies such as ChatGPT，Recognize the value of artificial intelligence products in the digital era，Encourage young scholars to organically combine existing research methods with digital technology，Expand future legal empirical research methods。
Teacher Shi Jiahui, assistant researcher at Sichuan University, combines the distinction between Chinese and foreign legal systems and practices，Focusing on criminal law，Sharing that digital technology is expanding the dimension of public power law enforcement、Many aspects of infringing on citizens’ personal privacy，Emphasis on the country-specific attributes of technology and law，Should be analyzed in detail。
Associate Professor Kuang Kai of Central South University School of Law provides a detailed analysis of the connotation of the digital age，Summary of three challenges: "digitization of research objects and content", "standardization of China's data element market" and "informatization and intelligence of data processing processes"，Application of WeChat chat records in litigation、The government’s management functions and normative basis for the data element market、The impact of digital technology on some professions and other matters，Discusses the challenges of the digital age in detail。
In the final review session，Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Professor Bin Liang from Oklahoma State University recognized the comprehensiveness and in-depthness of the conference’s exchanges and thinking，Expressed appreciation and encouragement for the ideological collision of scholars and guests under various topics。Professor Liang Bin reminds，To the digital age、Big data concepts, etc. should be viewed critically，Look at the hot current situation of digital technology rationally，Focus on the factual dilemma of digital technology promotion；Scholars should better understand the digital age、Use of digital technology，Look at the opportunities and challenges of the digital age from a development perspective。
College of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University, Professor Yan Zhang of Sam Houston State University also participated in the discussion，Remind all scholars to rationally distinguish between science and law，Lay a solid foundation for future research。
Closing Ceremony
After the end of the academic seminars on each topic，Participating scholars were jointly attended by the deputy director of Hunan Smart Rule of Law Research Institute、The joint closing ceremony of the "10th Quantitative Law Forum and the Second Empirical Law Youth Academic Salon of the International Academic Symposium" hosted by Professor Wang Wensheng, Vice Dean of Hunan University Law School。Deng Peng, Director of Beijing Kangda (Changsha) Law Firm and Party Branch Secretary of Hunan Ruijie Law Firm、Director Tan Yuanman delivered a closing speech respectively，Congratulations on the success of the forum。
Editor-in-Chief of "Huxiang Legal Review"、Professor Qu Maohui of Hunan University bet365 live online casinoLaw School made a wonderful summary of this conference，Point out the research perspective of this forum、He has made positive contributions to the academic community in terms of research methods and research theories；Many Bet365 lotto reviewscholars at home and abroad、Guests gathered together，Promoted communication among old friends、A big platform for new friends to meet each other，Expanded research and theoretical horizons；The academic community should combine the respective advantages of normative research and empirical research，Promote legal academic research in China、Promote the construction of rule of law in China。
Article
Picture
Review Dong Xuemei
