4month16日In the evening, the fifth session Bet365 sportsbook review Constitutional Teahouse is at the Law School114Classroom held。The theme of this bet365 casino blackjackissue is the constitutional interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review Supreme People’s Court’s judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review abolition Bet365 sportsbook review Qi Yuling case，By Wang Tianlin、Liang Guangyong、Liu Jianxun、Liu Wei and four others2008Level constitutional government、PhD student majoring in jurisprudence gave a keynote speech，By Associate Professor of Law School of Qingdao University、Our hospital2008Geng Yan, a doctoral candidate in constitutional government，Associate Professor, School of Liberal Arts, Shandong University of Science and Technology、Our hospital2007Wang Maoqing, a doctoral candidate in constitutional government, serves as a reviewer，Ph.D. in Constitutional Law、Doctoral Supervisor、Professor Fan Jinxue, Vice Dean Bet365 sportsbook review Law School, attended this tea party as a guest guide。Lecturer at the Law School of Shandong University of Economics、Our hospital2008Liu Qiyao, a doctoral candidate in constitutional government, hosted this tea party。

At the keynote stage，Wang Tianlin、Liang Guangyong、Liu Jianxun、Four doctoral students Liu Wei expressed different opinions on the judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review Supreme People’s Court’s annulment Bet365 sportsbook review Qi Yuling case。Wang Tianlin’s Judiciary Process of China’s Constitution、The relationship between judge’s decision and social factors、The Supreme People’Best slot on Bet365s Court analyzed and interpreted the attitude Bet365 sportsbook review judicialization Bet365 sportsbook review Constitution and other aspects。Liang Guangyong conducted a background analysis on the judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review Supreme Court’s annulment Bet365 sportsbook review case，He analyzed the judicialization issues Bet365 sportsbook review Chinese Constitution caused by the Qi Yuling case from the perspective Bet365 sportsbook review Second Five-Year Reform Program and the Third Five-Year Reform Program.。Next，Liu Jianxun explained the reasons for the abolition Bet365 sportsbook review judicial interpretation of Qi Yuling case。Liu Wei also put forward his own views，He thinks，All sectors of society are allergic to the Supreme People’s Court’s judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review annulment Bet365 sportsbook review Qi Yuling case and the case itself，And elaborated on some thoughts on the construction of China’s constitutional government。ThenGeng Yan、Wang MaoqingCommented on the speeches of four speakers，I think they interpreted the judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review Supreme People's Court's annulment Bet365 sportsbook review Qi Yuling case from different angles，Complement each other，There is also a collision of opinions，Point out the problems in the speeches Bet365 sportsbook review four speakers at the same time，Guide everyone to explain the constitution in the free discussion stage、Legality Bet365 sportsbook review Constitution、In-depth discussion on the effectiveness Bet365 sportsbook review basic rights norms Bet365 sportsbook review Constitution。

After a lively free discussion,Fan JinxueThe professor bet365 best casino gamesmade wonderful comments on the speeches Bet365 sportsbook review four speakers based on everyone’s free discussion。Fan JinxueThe professor thinks，The Qi Yuling case is very different from the famous Marbury v. Madison case in the United States，Social background、Legal conditions are different。Besides, he is right2008Abolished in 17189_1719327The reasons for the abolition of this judicial interpretation were analyzed，Considers that the reason for the abolition Bet365 sportsbook review judicial interpretation Bet365 sportsbook review Qi Yuling case is that it has ceased application and cannot be established。He believes that it is necessary for China to further explore issues such as constitutional interpretation，And made a detailed analysis。