12month19日, Associate bet365 casino blackjackProfessor Ken Sangben, School of Bet365 sportsbook reviewIn Bet365 sportsbook review school101The lecture hall gave a lecture entitled "The embarrassment of traditional Bet365 sportsbook review - facing the Xu Ting case"'s academic report.Associate Professor Sang Benqian combined with Xu Ting’s case,A systematic discussion on embarrassing issues in traditional Bet365 sportsbook review。

Teacher Sang thinks，Xu Ting’s case poses little challenge to the current legal system，The most important significance is that it tests the theoretical literacy of the legal community and the traditional Bet365 sportsbook review。Teacher Sang’s different analysis of the origins of traditional Bet365 sportsbook review and economic theory about crime and criminal law。

1. UtilizationATMIs the act of withdrawing money from the machine theft?

Whether Xu Ting constitutes a crime，Theoretical debate centers on whether the theft must be secret。But the key to this case is not the connection between secrets and theft，It depends on whether the victim’s knowledge will cause a substantial obstacle to the theft。From an economic perspective，The deterrent effect of punishment is equivalent to the product Bet365of the severity of punishment and the probability of punishment。Compared with secret thief，It is easier to be caught if you steal openly，Other things being equal，The sentencing for stealing is low，It will stimulate criminals to tend to steal openly and steal secretly，This will definitely reduce the police’s cost of solving crimes。

二、ATMLegal consequences caused by malfunction

In judicial practice，The victim’s fault can be a reason for reducing or reducing punishment。But in the Xu Ting case，The victim’s fault is just an excuse。ATMSo many, a certain stationATMAn error occurred during the upgrade，More of an accident。The bank has two options，Or tolerate itATMLoss caused by failure, either avoidedATM's fault。The bank will choose tolerance with much lower cost。This means compared to other crimes where the victim was at fault，UseATMMachine crime，In fact, it is a punishment for his mistakes，This is an appropriate correction for his fault。But Xu Ting’s theft of financial institutions did not have such an effect，Because this type of crime has no obvious output。As the victim, the bank became the biggest winner bet365 casino blackjackin the sensational effect of this case，Extensive media coverage of banks protecting their assets，At the same time, make the general public aware that such behavior constitutes a crime，acts as a deterrent。