The morning of May 28th，The eighth session of bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer Law Youth Forum was held in Huagangyuan, Qingdao Campus。Zheng Yushuang, associate professor at the Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, said "What is damage?An academic report on the theme of “An Analysis of Legal Philosophy”。This lecture is hosted by Fu Aizhu, assistant researcher at bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer，Director of bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer Civil and Commercial Law Institute、Doctoral supervisor Professor Zhang Pinghua，bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer Assistant Researcher Hu Naixin、bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer assistant researcher Tian Mengmeng，Best slot on Bet365Bet365 Bet365 Online Live Dealer associate researcher Song Baozhen talks，More than 20 teachers and students from the Law School attended the meeting。
The beginning of the lecture，Zheng Yushuang pointed out that the state’s mandatory regulation of citizens’ behavior needs legitimacy support，Legal coercion theory provides a theoretical basis for state coercive behavior。First，He combined Feinberg’s view of legal coercion，Divide the principle of legal coercion into the principle of harm、Offense principle、Legal Paternalism and Legal Moralism。The harm principle provides legitimacy for state intervention。From a normative perspective，Feinberg Bet365 Online Live Dealer refers to the abstract state of Bet365 Online Live Dealer to the perfect state of things，The main manifestation is that the perpetrator suffers illegal behavior or illegal treatment。In the usual sense，Harm is understood as an obstacle to interests，Interests can be divided into welfare interests and hidden interests。For moral Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Vicarious damages、Bet365 Online Live Dealer after death、The controversial issue of whether Bet365 Online Live Dealer before birth is legal Bet365 Online Live Dealer，Zheng Yushuang gave a positive reply。In terms of liability for Bet365 Online Live Dealer，Zheng Yushuang pointed out that illegal infringement must be morally blameworthy，It is not in accordance with the victim’s wishes and has a causal relationship。When determining the degree of liability of the perpetrator，Should be from Bet365 Online Live Dealer size、Possibility of Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Overall Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Analysis of the particularity of freedom interests from four angles。Due to the different areas involved in departmental laws，The specific interests damaged are different，Mainly reflected in harming competitive bet365 casino blackjackinterests、Public interest、Four consequences of cumulative Bet365 Online Live Dealer and imitative Bet365 Online Live Dealer。Subsequently，Zheng Yushuang sorted out the comparative harm view and moral harm view in the theoretical circles。The comparative view of harm recognizes the concept of harm proposed by Feinberg，Also supports the harm principle，And further improve the Bet365 Online Live Dealer theory within the framework of Feinberg's doctrine。The concept of moral harm completely denies Feinberg’s concept of harm and the principle of harm，Constructing a new Bet365 Online Live Dealer framework by replacing “interests” with “morality”。Last，Zheng Yushuang questioned Feinberg’s concept of Bet365 Online Live Dealer and principle of Bet365 Online Live Dealer，Point out that although the external form of Bet365 Online Live Dealer is constantly changing，But its connotation still needs to be determined with the help of moral analysis，Future research should focus on the defense of the principle of harm and the relative separation of the connotation of harm。
Conversation session，Fu Aizhu expresses his sincere thanks to Zheng Yushuang，And highly affirmed the content of the lecture。Zhang Pinghua believes that Zheng Yushuang’s research takes into account both internal and external perspectives and pays attention to the sublation of theory，His solid basic skills and methodology are impressive。Zhang Pinghua’s characteristics of Bet365 Online Live Dealer、Express your own views on the three aspects of Bet365 Online Live Dealer calculation and relief as well as Bet365 Online Live Dealer liability，And proposed that when studying Bet365 Online Live Dealer, we should pay attention to the interactive analysis between different legal philosophies。Hu Naixin believes that Bet365 Online Live Dealer is the prerequisite for relief，Therefore the definition Bet365 lotto reviewof Bet365 Online Live Dealer is very important，However, the way civil law mostly defines Bet365 Online Live Dealer from the perspective of rights and interests needs to be further improved。Also，Hu Naixin expresses her opinions on the issue of establishing a unified concept of Bet365 Online Live Dealer between civil and criminal authorities。Tian Mengmeng proposed exceptions to Bet365 Online Live Dealer from the perspective of economic and social law，And social law research mostly explores the relationship between the state and citizens from the concept of risk，Give the country a positive obligation to intervene；Punitive damages in economic law will not only take the Bet365 Online Live Dealer itself as a factor，The loss of related interests caused by the Bet365 Online Live Dealer will also be considered。Last，Zheng Yushuang gave detailed responses and answers to the content of the talks。
Introduction to the speaker: Zheng Yushuang，People from Rizhao, Shandong。Doctor of Laws and Postdocs，Associate Professor, Law School, China University of Political Science and Law，PhD supervisor，Qian Duansheng Young Scholar，Princeton University、Visiting scholar at Oxford University，Director of Jurisprudence Research Society of China Law Society，Director of Beijing Supervision Research Association。Engaged in jurisprudence and legal theory research。Published multiple papers in various publications such as "Chinese Law" and "Tsinghua Law"，Host the National Social Science Fund、Many projects including the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education。
Text
Picture
Audit
