December 11，bet365 app’s “Intellectual Property+” characteristic legal talent training series lectures were held online。Professor Feng Xiaoqing from the School of Civil, Commercial and Economic Law of China University of Political Science and Law gave a lecture titled "Construction and Reform of the Intellectual Property Bet365System from the Perspective of the Public Domain"。This report was hosted by Professor Zhang Haiyan, Vice President of Bet365 App，Professor Yan Wenjun, Vice Dean of the School of Intellectual Property, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、Professor Cui Lihong, Director of the bet365 App Institute of Intellectual Property Law, served as the panellist。
Professor Feng Xiaoqing studied law、Economics、Analysis in the fields of management and public policy，Reveals the value of balancing exclusive rights and public interest protection in the intellectual property system，Based on the academic perspective of public property and user rights，Uncontrolled、Introduction to public domain properties that can be freely used。Then，Summary of the public domain in the copyright system，Elaborated thoughts on factual works，Propose the standard for copyright protection in the public domain of original expression，Through judicial practice cases of various types of intellectual property rights，A detailed analysis of the phenomenon of using the public domain as a defense to infringement。Last，It is recommended to use the concept of public domain as the guiding ideology of legislation，Appropriately modify existing legal provisions，Summary of current judicial practice experience，Provide ideas for the improvement of my country’s intellectual property law。
Conversation session，Professor Yan Wenjun suggested that students systematically Bet365 Online Live Dealergrasp the basic system of intellectual property and capture the theoretical frontier，Start with the concept，Think about how to divide the personal domain and the private domain based on the specific intellectual property legal system。Professor Cui Lihong advocates determining the boundaries between the public and private spheres based on different types of intellectual property rights，Emphasis on the different boundaries between rights protection and the public domain in the field of administrative review authorization and automatic acquisition of rights，The claimant of the latter rights should not only bear more burden of proof，The court must also take the initiative to review according to its authority。Interactive session，Professor Feng Xiaoqing patiently and carefully answered the questions raised by the participating students。
Last report，Professor Zhang Haiyan expressed her sincere gratitude to Professor Feng Xiaoqing for the wonderful report he brought to the teachers and students of the Law School，And proposed that the definition of public interest in civil law and the definition of public domain in intellectual property law are homogeneous，The construction and reform of the intellectual property Bet365System from the Perspective of the public domain must not only be committed to the protection of individual rights and interests，We must take the overall situation into consideration，Serving economic and social Bet365 sportsbook reviewdevelopment，Realize scientific development and technological innovation。
Feng Xiaoqing, second-level professor at China University of Political Science and Law、Doctoral Supervisor，Director of the Institute of Intellectual Property Law and Head of the National Key Subject of Intellectual Property Law,Director of the Intangible Asset Management Research Center of China University of Political Science and Law。Concurrently serves as Vice President of China Intellectual Property Law Research Association、Member of the Academic Advisory Committee of the China Intellectual Property Research Association、Deputy Chairman of the Intellectual Property Professional Committee of Colleges and Universities of China Intellectual Property Research Association，Member of the Supreme People’s Court Case Guidance Expert Committee，Researcher at the Intellectual Property Judicial Protection Research Center of the Supreme People’s Court。
Text/Wu Changyi Li Yuchen
Picture/Liu Yanqiu
Audit/Cui Lihong
