May 27，The School of Law invites Professor Xiong Qiuhong, Dean of the Institute of Litigation Law of China University of Political Science and Law, to be a guest at the Shandong University Law High-end Forum，Made a report entitled "Reflections on the Relationship between Public Bet365 Poker and Private Bet365 Poker"。This lecture is hosted by Zhou Bet365 sportsbook reviewChangjun, Dean of bet365app，Lin Xifen, Professor of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Koyuan Law School、Bet365 App Professor Hu Changlong participated in this lecture as a speaker。
Professor Xiong Qiuhong named Lang from Hangzhou、He’s alleged defamation case is the starting point，Introducing the discussion between the theoretical and practical circles on the relationship between public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker。She thinks，From the perspective of historical development，Criminal Bet365 Poker methods have experienced changes from private Bet365 Poker to state Bet365 Poker。Around the world，There is prosecutorial authoritarianism in criminal Bet365 Poker methods、Prosecutors mainly prosecute but also use grand jury Bet365 Poker、Focus on prosecutions by prosecutors and also include private prosecutions by victims、Multi-subject Bet365 Poker based on the principle of private Bet365 Poker and other forms。Among them，The two most common forms are prosecutorial Bet365 Poker authoritarianism and prosecutorial Bet365 Poker and victim private Bet365 Poker.。
Professor Xiong Qiuhong pointed out，In terms of the theoretical basis of the relationship between public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker，There is an inherent theory of the victim’s right to private Bet365 Poker、On the Transfer of National Public Bet365 Poker Rights、The debate on the reasonable distribution of the right of public Bet365 Poker and the right of private Bet365 Poker，There is a conceptual difference between the separation Best slot on Bet365theory and the transformation theory of public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker。There are many problems in the relationship between public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker in my country’s current criminal procedure law，Needs to be refactored。The basic ideas for improving the relationship between public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker in our country include: the victim’s right to sue can be realized in a variety of ways；The concept of national Bet365 Poker should be firmly established；We can consider limiting or even abolishing private prosecutions；The relationship between substantive law and procedural law should be properly handled；The connection between private Bet365 Poker and public Bet365 Poker should be made。
Conversation session，Professor Lin Xifen from the historical perspective、Review of Professor Xiong Qiuhong’s lectures from the normative level and the epistemological level，And discuss the pros and cons of abolishing private Bet365 Poker、Proposed his own thoughts on the reasons for the low proportion of private Bet365 Poker cases。Professor Hu Changlong discusses the purpose of punishment、Litigation efficiency、An extended discussion on the relationship between public Bet365 Poker and private Bet365 Poker from the perspective of modernization of criminal law governance。Professor Xiong Qiuhong then gave a brief response，Professor Zhou Changjun expressed his gratitude to Professor Xiong Qiuhong for his wonderful report and the Bet365 sportsbook reviewspeaker’s sharing of views。
Xiong Qiuhong，Hubei Tianmen people，Currently Dean of the Procedural Law Institute of China University of Political Science and Law, a key research base for humanities and social sciences of the Ministry of Education，Director of the Procuratorial Basic Theory Research Base of China University of Political Science and Law，Professor of National Judicial Civilization Innovation Center、Doctoral Supervisor，Concurrently serves as the executive director of the China Criminal Procedure Law Research Association、Executive Director of the Integrity and Legal Research Society of China Law Society、Special consultant from the Supreme People’s Court。Elected as the sixth “Top Ten Outstanding Young Jurists in the Country”。Former director of the Procedural Law Office of the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences，Served as deputy director of the Office of the Judicial Reform Leading Group of the Supreme People's Court。
Pei Qianqian/Text
Liu Yu/Picture
Zhou Changjun/review
